<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Social Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks</link>
	<description>Advanced Technology Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-9088</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks#comment-9088</guid>
		<description>As an adopted (and glad to be so) New Yorker, I absolutely agree with you.  BTW, what Garbo actually said was &quot;I want to be let alone&quot;, a very different sentiment and one much more in line with what you&#039;re describing.

It would be nice, though, in a filtered world to occasionally let through a complete random or two, to emulate what happens when strangers strike up conversations at bus stops.  I just don&#039;t want to be waiting for the bus *all the time*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an adopted (and glad to be so) New Yorker, I absolutely agree with you.  BTW, what Garbo actually said was &#8220;I want to be let alone&#8221;, a very different sentiment and one much more in line with what you&#8217;re describing.</p>
<p>It would be nice, though, in a filtered world to occasionally let through a complete random or two, to emulate what happens when strangers strike up conversations at bus stops.  I just don&#8217;t want to be waiting for the bus *all the time*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avi</title>
		<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-4462</link>
		<dc:creator>avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks#comment-4462</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s interesting that several of you jump right to the negatives of filtering, especially the political. I think the thing people would filter on is whether they want to have a political discussion or not -- some people just don&#039;t want to talk politics, at least at certain times. And if you met those people at a party and started talking politics, they would simply think you were rude and find a way to escape the conversation.

I guess what I&#039;m proposing isn&#039;t any different than real life or the web in that &quot;attention&quot; is an act of filtering everything out but the thing we want to attend to. In a party, we filter out the noise, and the people we&#039;ve met but didn&#039;t click with. On the web, sure, you can experience the &quot;whole web,&quot; but more likely, you follow links from one site to another, which is a form of filtering. Using a search engine is a big form of filtering, where pages are returned that match your current task. Showing you extraneous pages _might_ lead to an interesting discovery, but it&#039;s generally considered a nuisance. 

So again, why do we assume that the right way to display people in virtual worlds is to show everyone at once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s interesting that several of you jump right to the negatives of filtering, especially the political. I think the thing people would filter on is whether they want to have a political discussion or not &#8212; some people just don&#8217;t want to talk politics, at least at certain times. And if you met those people at a party and started talking politics, they would simply think you were rude and find a way to escape the conversation.</p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m proposing isn&#8217;t any different than real life or the web in that &#8220;attention&#8221; is an act of filtering everything out but the thing we want to attend to. In a party, we filter out the noise, and the people we&#8217;ve met but didn&#8217;t click with. On the web, sure, you can experience the &#8220;whole web,&#8221; but more likely, you follow links from one site to another, which is a form of filtering. Using a search engine is a big form of filtering, where pages are returned that match your current task. Showing you extraneous pages _might_ lead to an interesting discovery, but it&#8217;s generally considered a nuisance. </p>
<p>So again, why do we assume that the right way to display people in virtual worlds is to show everyone at once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>Tricky,

if this goes through and the social repercussions will be globally accepted it will lead to more intolerance in the real world, where it is not as easy to filter people in your surrounding. 

Things that may happen in the end: People will become absolutely intolerant to any opinion outside their cosmos of ideals. Good thing is, there would not be any more known poverty or starvation in the real world. 

Hardly anyone likes to heard about it, so it will be just filtered. Oh right, that even happens today, just not controlled by ever individual. See the TV and Newspaper news? More people died in Africa from starvation than in all past wars together. Thousands got slaughtered by fanatics even there was a UN Presence in the area.

It would also lead to a sorta new kind of Stupidity. If you continue to focus on things you like, your Brain will adapt and you will be less and less interested in other things. That means you can grow dramatically inflexible. Good for all kind of evil marketing stuff.

The resulting world could never be democratic, because no one could understand the other persons point of view. (So you actually could not vote for someone else but yourself). Not that this is new. I guess we are all running towards something like that. 

Yay, time for me to set up some filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricky,</p>
<p>if this goes through and the social repercussions will be globally accepted it will lead to more intolerance in the real world, where it is not as easy to filter people in your surrounding. </p>
<p>Things that may happen in the end: People will become absolutely intolerant to any opinion outside their cosmos of ideals. Good thing is, there would not be any more known poverty or starvation in the real world. </p>
<p>Hardly anyone likes to heard about it, so it will be just filtered. Oh right, that even happens today, just not controlled by ever individual. See the TV and Newspaper news? More people died in Africa from starvation than in all past wars together. Thousands got slaughtered by fanatics even there was a UN Presence in the area.</p>
<p>It would also lead to a sorta new kind of Stupidity. If you continue to focus on things you like, your Brain will adapt and you will be less and less interested in other things. That means you can grow dramatically inflexible. Good for all kind of evil marketing stuff.</p>
<p>The resulting world could never be democratic, because no one could understand the other persons point of view. (So you actually could not vote for someone else but yourself). Not that this is new. I guess we are all running towards something like that. </p>
<p>Yay, time for me to set up some filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamilah</title>
		<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamilah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Daniel. To put my version of what you said briefly, I like the serendipity of meeting random people even if you have to bump into a lot of knuckleheads in the process. Also, I&#039;ve been looking into the so-called &quot;Web 2.0&quot; and it looks like there are plenty of niche areas to fill and find a tailor-made community if one wants to. What I&#039;d like to see is a *greater* number of people on the web. There are very underrepresented areas in the world.  Also improved translation services that actually allow chat in one&#039;s own language (maybe this exists in some form already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Daniel. To put my version of what you said briefly, I like the serendipity of meeting random people even if you have to bump into a lot of knuckleheads in the process. Also, I&#8217;ve been looking into the so-called &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; and it looks like there are plenty of niche areas to fill and find a tailor-made community if one wants to. What I&#8217;d like to see is a *greater* number of people on the web. There are very underrepresented areas in the world.  Also improved translation services that actually allow chat in one&#8217;s own language (maybe this exists in some form already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-4267</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realityprime.com/articles/anti-social-networks#comment-4267</guid>
		<description>Although I feel that elegance in personalization has been lacking in [functional] development in technologies, in favor of more of the same to-do with the advertising and marketing models of serving data to the individual -- I also feel that the process of learning is more often enhanced by the factors of negativity or mistakes made in the process, than what most of us are willing to accept.

Thus -- I would prefer to see the ugly guy, or be the ugly guy to others, on the subway or in the restaurant -- than to not be anything at all, except a shell of me and my own interests.

Evolution in learning is an interesting kind of thing in this regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I feel that elegance in personalization has been lacking in [functional] development in technologies, in favor of more of the same to-do with the advertising and marketing models of serving data to the individual &#8212; I also feel that the process of learning is more often enhanced by the factors of negativity or mistakes made in the process, than what most of us are willing to accept.</p>
<p>Thus &#8212; I would prefer to see the ugly guy, or be the ugly guy to others, on the subway or in the restaurant &#8212; than to not be anything at all, except a shell of me and my own interests.</p>
<p>Evolution in learning is an interesting kind of thing in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

