Comments on: From Video to 3D Models http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models Advanced Technology Research Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:28:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: From Video to 3D Models http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models/comment-page-1#comment-5351 From Video to 3D Models Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:02:28 +0000 http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models#comment-5351 [...] From Video to 3D Models [...] [...] From Video to 3D Models [...]

]]> By: Some scummy person http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models/comment-page-1#comment-4897 Some scummy person Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:29:09 +0000 http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models#comment-4897 Daniel - why wouldn't a pair of video camera suffice? Or what about that idea I saw recently of including a mirror at one side of your field of view, so that you can see the same image from two offsets in one frame? Daniel – why wouldn’t a pair of video camera suffice? Or what about that idea I saw recently of including a mirror at one side of your field of view, so that you can see the same image from two offsets in one frame?

]]> By: Niraj http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models/comment-page-1#comment-4864 Niraj Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:36:25 +0000 http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models#comment-4864 That's a very slick tool...the video's up on YouTube as well if you're trying to embed it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vda2RAEuW_g That’s a very slick tool…the video’s up on YouTube as well if you’re trying to embed it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vda2RAEuW_g

]]> By: Daniel http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models/comment-page-1#comment-4816 Daniel Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:36:48 +0000 http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models#comment-4816 The low-latency modeling stuff is probably the 'way to go', I think, for automating 3D output -- but until a video camera exists that can give accurate angle calculations from its location, it'll be difficult to 'video-reg' each point. We were working quite a bit toward automatic 3D generation from 2D imagery -- but the problem that exists there, is you'd need imagery that's off-nadir. Pictometry, for example, is an ideal imagery source -- but because it's high-latency, it will never prove efficient as video for that purpose. Or so, that's my take on it. The low-latency modeling stuff is probably the ‘way to go’, I think, for automating 3D output — but until a video camera exists that can give accurate angle calculations from its location, it’ll be difficult to ‘video-reg’ each point.

We were working quite a bit toward automatic 3D generation from 2D imagery — but the problem that exists there, is you’d need imagery that’s off-nadir. Pictometry, for example, is an ideal imagery source — but because it’s high-latency, it will never prove efficient as video for that purpose.

Or so, that’s my take on it.

]]> By: GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web » From Video to 3D Models http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models/comment-page-1#comment-4810 GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web » From Video to 3D Models Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:54:31 +0000 http://www.realityprime.com/articles/from-video-to-3d-models#comment-4810 [...] Paul Downey wrote an interesting post today!.Here’s a quick excerptThis isn’t quite ready to turn, say, Google’s Street View photos or video into 3D models just yet, but it’s close. Once the system can infer surfaces without human intervention, perhaps only requiring people to go in and fix mistakes, … [...] [...] Paul Downey wrote an interesting post today!.Here’s a quick excerptThis isn’t quite ready to turn, say, Google’s Street View photos or video into 3D models just yet, but it’s close. Once the system can infer surfaces without human intervention, perhaps only requiring people to go in and fix mistakes, … [...]

]]>