Latest News and Articles

Read/Write World

It’s not often since I started at Microsoft 3 years ago that I get to blog about what I’m working on. It’s not that anyone had ever explicitly told me not to, but sharing my daily web research and observations publicly (even if the source links were already public) would have likely compromised the secrecy I’d agreed to, since I tend to blog about whatever’s most on my mind. [And forget twitter. My tl;drs alone are more than 140 characters]

With my current project, the situation is much improved blog-wise. We concluded recently that the best way to accomplish our goals was to be open and even solicit cooperation from outside. Quite a concept!

The project’s name isĀ Read/Write World.

[Read more →]

Photosynth for iPhone

Update: Photosynth for iPhone has passed the THREE million download mark!

Photosynth for iPhone

Photosynth for iPhone

 

Photosynth for the iPhone has finally hit the app store this week. It’s doing exceptionally well, and it’s not surprising. Taking photos on the phone is a very narrow experience. This app redefines that experience to let you take photos as wide as you want, up to a full 360 degrees. You can then publish your photos and share them in full quality.

Kudos to the Panorama team for hitting a homerun on their first time (standalone) at bat.

Wow

Of all the videos of the 9.0 quake, this is both the calmest and most visceral I’ve seen conveying just how how scary it must have been.

I believe this flooding effect is called liquefaction, whereby the ground can turn to quicksand in seconds. It doesn’t help that this is on reclaimed land in Toyko harbor, because the next thought after “holy shit” is Tsunami.

Digital Authorship Graph

We’re building our content wrong and it’s time to fix it.

Authors, musicians, filmmakers, reporters (or at least the entities collecting the checks in their names) complain about their work being copied illegally. We force intentionally defective DRM regimes on the most innocent consumers (i.e., most of us). And yet the first thing you learn as an author is that “bad artists copy, great artists steal.”

Indeed, artists both copy and steal from each other all the time. Art is about 98% creatively recycled and 2% new. And that’s no discredit to the artist. That’s just how it works. That goes to the very definition of trope, genre, and communication that they must conscientiously build on what came before. If everything was new all the time, we wouldn’t understand or enjoy it one bit.

And yet our content creation and delivery regimes don’t ever seem to take this into account. They don’t make it easier to copy with attribution. They don’t make it easier to get permission or give proportional credit or flow money back to contributors when the money flows in. They force us to try to protect the raw bits of expression, when what we should really be protecting are those 2% new ideas (a lot) and the 98% creative remix (somewhat less) and let the bits run free, as they will anyway.

I’ve spent most of my career working on this problem indirectly. I wrote the procedural object code for Second Life, meant to make mashups of 3D objects easier. I helped convince parts of Microsoft to invest in what we called “parametric 3D video” (though the present result of that effort is only addressing one part of the problem space). I pitched and/or worked on even more ideas that haven’t gotten that far in this particular direction, alas. It’s too big a problem, and it requires more long-term vision to go it alone.

It’s time for others to help take on the challenge of building a graph that connects authors and artists along with those that remix them. The graph is the back-end of better content tools that make it easy to remix. The graph should easily be invoked in places like YouTube, 4chan, Fark, and machinima.com. It should be under the hood of iMovie, Blender and Photoshop.

In other words, it has to be open. And I think the best vehicle for this right now is Facebook’s push called Open Graph. Metadata already solves the instantaneous authorship problem — who created this page or entity. Now we just need a way of more easily including content from other people that also respects and preserves their authorship information in a trusted way. And once that graph is constructed, we can do things like:

1. automatic credits and attribution on any derivative work

2. automatic creative commons support to remove legal uncertainty from remixing

3. automatic flow of micropayments (partial credit automatically computed) when a derivative work receives some compensation. No general expectation of front-end payment or negotiation for simply including something that might never make money.

If there’s a way to support artists in a world where copying is both inevitable and acceptable, this, I believe, is it. And if there’s any incentive for the engineering and business work that is required to pull this off, it’s right there inside #3.

Now, if you have a few minutes, watch these videos (and kindly donate to their author for his excellent work..)

Everything is a Remix from Kirby Ferguson on Vimeo.

Everything is a Remix Part 2 from Kirby Ferguson on Vimeo.

Then, if you have a few more minutes, read my old manifesto against DRM and for a new model of protecting/fostering authorship that takes those two videos into account, which is the first time I publicly talked about these ideas.

I have seen the future of 3D

I haven’t laughed this hard in a while.

Bing for Mobile 2.0

I work with these folks, so I’m happy to finally be able to show off their impressive handiwork. Here’s a peek.

Humans can’t walk straight

If my post on us all being stupider than we think isn’t enough, here’s a nicely told story about how and why we can’t even walk in straight lines. [from NPR via Gizmodo]


Today’s easily-misconstrued satirical meta comment

My current pet theory can be summed up in 3 words: people (meaning: all of us) are stupid. This replaces my former pet theory that people are an amazingly brilliant collection of neurons and motor bits unprecedented in history of the universe. Both theories may simultaneously be true, but I’m going with the new one for now.

Sure, we want to be pleasant about it and say that we’re all smart in our own special way. Or even collectively, look what wonderful things we can do. “look at the pyramids! look at the moon landings! look at ‘Jeopardy, with Alex Trebek!’” as evidence of how smart we all are.

Yes, compared to a potato, we’re very clever indeed. But there are many more cases of someone getting a potato stuck up their bum (and you don’t see any potatoes doing anything that stupid, so who is really dumber?).

The real issue, however, is that the difference between the dumbest and smartest human beings who ever lived is just one vs. two drops of water in an ocean of potential knowledge and wisdom. Even the most enlightened people ever, of which there have been perhaps 3, can barely transcend the human condition and the mysticism it engenders, and not one of them bothered to unify quantum theory with gravity while he/she was revealing the secrets of the universe.

Let’s face it. Perceptual studies show that we take in only a very small fraction of our dynamic environment and simply imagine the rest, fully believing what we see, hear and remember. We drive our cars at 65 mph, just a few degrees to the right of instant death, and do it while talking on the phone, reading a book on the steering wheel. We sometimes wallow in blissful ignorance of all we could learn or know. In fact, some people even do this professionally and on TV, and we collectively pay for it.

We are just that dumb. And yet we survive and move on, which is all the more impressive, when you think about it.

But note, my theory is more nuanced than just sheer globally staggering stupidity. Yes, there are broadly speaking two special kinds of stupid.

There are those, like me, who know we’re stupid and freely admit. Now, I might not know precisely how stupid I am (if I did, that would be quite smart!), but I know we’re pretty darn stupid on the whole, notwithstanding occasional bouts of inspiration and luck in painting masterpieces and avoiding rectal potatoes, head-on-collisions, and the like.

And yet there are those of us in the latter category, who don’t even know we’re stupid in the least. Never occurred to them, nor do they care. Some people call it arrogance, or ignorance, and some merely classify it as a clever (if ultimately stupid) coping mechanism to handle a pervasive mental handicap without letting it get them down.

I call it stupid stupid.

The stupid stupid are all around us, impossible to escape. And they really don’t understand how or why you might use some of the various methods we’ve worked to overcome our innate stupidity and bias (namely: science, history, practice, and education in general) to try to learn something and be, well, smarter and better than before. Doing this, of course, is a direct threat to the bliss of stupid stupidity, whose motto might well be “I’m with stupid” with an arrow pointing to no one.

But take those amazing pyramids or moon landings, or even ‘Jeopardy, with Alex Trebek,’ and you’ll see a pattern of people behind them, all knowing that they just don’t know and each evolving strategies for successfully overcoming that limitation. They do this much faster than evolution would normally allow, say a few minutes to a few decades vs. geologic time. Imagine how long it would take us to evolve the behavior for playing Jeopardy, if left to instinct alone.

I’ve learned in my infinite stupidity that I get along best with the first category of people and often run into problems with the latter. Surprisingly, people in the stupid stupid category think the whole situation is reversed — that I must think I’m smarter than they are — and resent my obvious discrimination.

So let’s clear this up once and for all. I think we’re all pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things, myself included. I just think some folks work harder at overcoming it than others, that’s all. And anyone who doesn’t even try is truly stupid stupid.

And still, they blindly pledge their allegiances to people who self-assuredly claim to know exactly what they’re doing and what everyone else should do. Maybe we should instead honor the people who say, “I don’t know, but I’ll find out.”

Much credit to my former boss, Alex Kipman, for calling the first phase of any new project “the stupid phase.” But I think it’s best to think of every phase in the same way, and admit we’re just making it up as we go along.

Keyhole Founders Honored

medal

The co-founders of Keyhole (the team that build the original versions of Google Earth) were honored last night by the Geological Society of America. We received the President’s Medal for the contributions Google Earth has made to the geological sciences.

Co-founder Mark Aubin accepted the award in Denver on behalf of the founders and advisers. He said it well:

This crowd are very enthusiastic users of Google Earth. What we built has changed the way they do their research and publish their results forever. It makes me proud to have contributed to science in this way, and you should all be proud also. I know that many other people have made Google Earth what it is today, but that doesn’t change the fact that we all started it.

medalmedal

Amazing Video-Mapped AR

I’ve seen a lot of projection-based AR in recent years, but this is probably the best example.

I think it could have used a lenghty pre-amble about turning off your camera’s flash though. Those annoying flashes don’t just diminish the experience for everyone, but the pictures won’t even come out! (except for the natural building, of course)

Here’s an idea I hereby anti-patent (release to public domain, assuming it’s not already patented). If the author of the below image is willing to let his art be used quasi-commercially, camera companies (esp. point-and-shoot) should make their cameras recognize this image and turn off the flash automatically. How’s that for idiot-proof?

(it might just need a little augmentation for the tag readers to more easily identify it).